Red Bulls**t

Old Ox

Would you confuse beer and an energy drink? Red Bull seems to think it’s customers are that stupid or maybe they’ll be confused that Red Bull has entered the beer market, if they came in contact with Virginia’s Old Ox Brewery?

Attorneys for the extreme drink certainly think so, and have filed a complaint in the United States Patent and Trademark Office. In it, attorneys – always looking to increase their billable hours – for the energy drink assert some consumers might confuse the brands because “An ‘ox’ and a ‘bull’ both fall within the same class of ‘bovine’ animals and are virtually indistinguishable to most consumers. In addition, an ox is a castrated bull.”

In reply the Old Ox Brewery released a public letter asking the company that makes Red Bull energy drinks to drop its complaint.

Hey Red Bull –

You seem pretty cool. You sponsor snowboarders, adventure racers, rock climbers and motocross bikers. You launch people into space so that they can skydive back down to earth. That’s all really darn cool. For all I know, you’re reading this while strapping yourself into a Formula One racecar that is about to be lit on fire and jumped over a large chasm of some sort. How cool would that be? Feel free to give it a try.

Here’s the thing, though. You are being extremely uncool to us at Old Ox Brewery. We are a small startup brewery in Ashburn, Virginia. We’re family-run, we love beer, and we love our community. For reasons that we cannot understand, you have attempted to strong arm us into changing our identity for the last 10 months because you believe folks might mistake Old Ox beer for Red Bull energy drinks. We respectfully disagree. The only similarity between our two products is that they are both liquids. You make non-alcoholic (but very extreme) energy drinks. We make delicious (but laid-back) beer. Our consumers are looking for two distinctly different experiences from our respective products.

Basically you are holding us hostage with a list of demands that, if agreed to, would severely limit our ability to use our brand. Demands like, never use the colour red, silver or blue; never use red with any bovine term or image; and never produce soft drinks. Do you own the colour red? What about fuchsia, scarlet, crimson, or mauve? Are you planting your flag in the colour wheel and claiming those shades for Red Bull? Do you claim exclusive rights to all things bovine? Do you plan to herd all heifers, cows, yaks, buffalo, bison, and steer into your intellectual property corral, too?

When we refused to succumb to your demands, you responded by filing a formal opposition to not just our trademark but to the very name Old Ox Brewery. Way to step on our American dream. You say you are protecting your intellectual property rights, but your claim, in our opinion, is Red Bulls**t.

We can only interpret your actions as one thing—bullying. You are a big Red Bully. Just like that mean kid from grade school pushing everyone down on the playground and giving us post-gym class wedgies. You are giving us one hell of a corporate wedgie. We don’t appreciate it and we sure as hell don’t deserve it.

Is this really what you’re about? Are you a bully? Your extensive marketing campaigns (your glitzy advertising, your sponsored sports events, your death defying stunt shows, etc.) certainly don’t project that image. Take a hard look at your “case.” Can you honestly look at our brand and say, “this is a threat to my image?” We don’t think you can. Given that, we repeat our offer: We agree NEVER to produce energy drinks. In exchange, we are asking for one simple thing: Leave us alone. Drop this trademark dispute. The only people benefiting are the lawyers.

Sincerely and Uninfringingly Yours,

Chris Burns
President – Old Ox Brewery

As Shelly commented it’s easy to get confused
“I’m just a silly girl. Sometimes I really need an energy drink and I get confused why I’m in a brewery. Wait, why are they carding me for an energy drink? This is weird. Oh wait…. I’m getting drunk from this energy drink from my tulip glass.
And sometimes I’m in 7-11 thinking I can get a great craft beer, but this can is only making me hyper…
Why is life so hard?
I need a beer.”

Tuen Mun: The big question is WHY?

10428422_595221200579200_7190901835354212133_n

Why, when we have a malign government that failed to be moved by 79 days of Occupy have many highly motivated young people turned to combating smugglers?

Isn’t all this New Territories shenanigans just a side show to the main event which is political reform? Wouldn’t their efforts be best served outside Legco facing down the government they hate so much?

The answer to this question is a resounding NO!

Why?

Because all rules of the game have changed. In the eyes of the young people who make up these Direct Action Groups the Pan Democrats have been dallying with the government for 30 years and achieved all but nothing. For them, it’s an entirely new game and they are taking politics right back to the roots. Local politics for local people solving local issues. They are the masters of their own destiny now. Not distant politicians with political agendas that have been forged over decades. They know no-one is coming to save them. They know the force that they are fighting has enormous influence and resources, but they also know that real power lies within in the hearts and minds of the people.

10685355_1550683151852258_3098716232189413583_n

Over the past few months these groups have been working to capture the hearts and minds of the residents of Sheung Shui and Tuen Mun. The currency they are dealing with is called empowerment. A community empowered to take charge of its destiny is a powerful force for change.

Admittedly, there are many in these areas that are still slow to catch up with their message and struggle to separate these groups out from Occupy, but the tide is turning. The people in these long suffering districts are slowly realising that they have the power to take their districts back. Certainly, they may not agree fully with the Direct Action Groups hardcore tactics, but they fully support their message.

These groups have taken it upon themselves to be the hammer that breaks down the door of local issues. They openly accept that the police are authorised, from the very top, to use whatever force is necessary to meet them, for they understand clearly that the harder the police hit them, the louder their message is amplified.

In the current climate, provoking the police is not difficult at all. Just being there is enough for the police to come out fighting and the trap is sprung. The media predictably jump all over it and their goal is achieved. For the Direct Action Groups the Tuen Mun operation was a complete success. Every news media organisation in Hong Kong now has the plight of these affected communities front and centre. This is all thanks to a small group of politically astute, hardcore protesters, non of whom are much older than 27. Using a delicate blend of cooperation and confrontation they have bought a festering, hidden sore of Hong Kong life into the spotlight and laid it bare for everyone to see and solve. The locals thank them for it.

But let’s be clear here, these maybe raw, high stakes protests, but they are in no way coarse or uncontrolled. It’s a highly calculated balancing act between knowing when to push and knowing when to yield. This they learnt in the cauldron of the Mongkok Occupy. On Sunday, they played the police like an old fiddle.

Just being there was enough to make the police go into hyper aggression mode once again. This doesn’t mean to say that they relish conflict, nor does it mean to say that every time a person is pepper sprayed or arrested the group members aren’t beside themselves with anger and anguish.

Instead, it’s an acute awareness that the police have long since set themselves up as a political arm of the government, therefore they are a legitimate political force to be manipulated at will. An amplifier as it were, which the groups turn on or off depending upon the timings for their message. No doubt the police will now be bringing all the sophisticated powers they have to monitor these new groups and curb them at every turn.

Just take a while to digest that. Civic groups set up specifically to encourage and support local issues and problems are now the focus of the police, as if they were terrorists or triads. Can there be any doubt that Hong Kong is being lead down the wrong path by malignant people?

This kind of Direct Action like we have witnessed in Tuen Mun and Tai Po, may not be your cup of tea. They are certainly not the main road to universal suffrage, but they are an essential part of it. While some say that Occupy lost public support, they have begun to win it back where it counts, in the districts.

You may never fully understand them but don’t shun them. Take the time to understand. Open your eyes to what’s going on around you, take you head out of the sand and take an interest in the place you call home. Whatever your view, remember their goal is the same – an open corruption free Hong Kong where everyone can enjoy societies benefits not just the privileged few.

The wide range of protest is a hopeful sign that a genuine shift in society is taking place.

www.facebook.com/hkindigenous
https://hkindig.wordpress.com/

Addendum: Tuen Mun resident Fran Wong posted this comment on facebook:
Fran Wong Thanks for your in-depth report. As a Tuen Mun resident, I fully support this action and thank the Direction Action groups for organizing this. Unfortunately, there are alot of local residents who still have some misconception or doubts about these local groups, and some even consider them as triads and radical losers in the society. The most disappointing is that alot of local mainstream media rarely report the conflicts between these local groups and the blue-ribbon groups, or any injustices took place in the local districts in the previous weeks. But from all the videos which went viral, it’s crystal clear that the government/ the police are targeting these local groups.

I have lived in Tuen Mun since I was born. Lots of the residents here could tolerate the long traveling time to the city centre, the frequent traffic jams on Tuen Mun Highways, and the juvenile problems in the early 90s. Yet, the ‘multi-entry permit’ has brought a great deal of disturbance to this residential area. What has the government done all these years? Nothing. Now, the situation has only become bad to worse. So, you’re right! Looking at all the problems in HK, when no one is coming to save us, we have to empower ourselves. Indeed, I was amazed to see the flexible tactics these local groups adopted on Sunday. But it was also sad and worrying to see the young kids being arrested and beaten up by the police. I hope the young kids will try to keep themselves safe.

I truly appreciate what the local groups did on Sunday. They helped to unite the Tuen Mun residents to voice out and stand up. So, like what you said, we gotta explain, explain and explain to clear those so-obsessed- with-being-peaceful-rational-and-non-violent people’s misconception about these local Direction Action groups.

Thanks for reporting the truth to HK people. Your articles report a great deal of information which the local mainstream media rarely covers.

Match Report: HKCC Babes 5 – 0 Police Sirens

Leighton Asia HKCC Babes 5 – 0 Police Sirens

(note: the author takes no responsibility for the numerous, terrible, law enforcement puns in this article)

The Women’s National League 1 regular season drew to a close on Saturday, with HKCC Babes hosting Police Sirens at Aberdeen. Delays in earlier games meant kick-off was postponed until 18:45; with the sides opting to “play until the lights went out”.

The Police, in yellow, received the ball to start the first half, but good poaching from Winnie Cheung and Emily Tuck arrested their attack almost immediately, at which point HKCC turned on the heat. The second row partnership of Lauren Petersen and Cornelia Noren (making an exciting 15s debut) powered a dominant HKCC scrum, which perhaps let off Sirens lightly by not pressing its advantage in the drive. Babes set up camp in the Police 22, but it was only in the 20th minute that points went on the board, returning centre Julia Mason displaying excellent skills in the midfield and making space via a loop ball; then resisting three defenders to score on the far left of the field. The conversion was narrowly missed. HKCC should perhaps have had the courage of their convictions more often, working hard to create the space but then under-utilising this by relying too much on crashing the ball through the forwards. In full-flow, however, the Babes looked threatening and full of promise; Tinley Wong and Lucy Thomson, carrying matching shoulder injuries, scampered through the Police defence time and again but excellent speed and awarenesss from the Siren’s scrum half saved their bacon, securing turnover ball in some sloppy rucks.

The second half was an equally scrappy affair. The Babes’ occupation of the Police half threatened to last the entire game, as the HKCC scrum brought the Babes to within the 5 yard line yet again. Several phases later the referee raised his arm to indicate a try. The decision was overturned on appeal, both Babes and officials having being deceived by extraneous white paint on the pitch and thus short of the true try line. With possession secured, Carolyn Champion peeled off the back of a subsequent ruck but couldn’t find the final yards as the ball was held up yet again. Sirens broke out of their 22 on the left wing and, at full flight with support behind, looked nailed-on to score. But full back Brenda Chan bailed HKCC out of trouble with spectacular reading of the play and a well-timed tackle that forced a line out. HKCC soon stomped back down the field, hackles raised by some subtle infringements in the ruck – well, as subtle as stamping and hair pulling can be. Scrum half Lynda Nazer’s prints were all over the ball as she distributed it throughout a stop-start series of phases that saw no real breakthrough.

The first significant defensive error from the Babes (forming a line more umbrella shaped than flat) allowed Police to break through again, with winger Steph Zhang halting the attack but earning a card for doing so with a high tackle. And as the minutes ticked down, a second error, in not retreating ten yards from a penalty, earned Sirens their chance in the Babes 22. An over-zealous quick-tap was firmly rebuffed by the referee, and then play halted for several minutes to deal with an injured Sirens’ player. In the cold, the Police massed around the ball. The Babes closed ranks on their try line, poised and ready. After nearly 60 minutes, the game hinged on what was deemed the final minute. The Babes held their line after four phases. Sirens looked to pass across the width of the field, to exploit the space of the extra player. Excellent blitz defending held out to the very end though, and Sirens couldn’t hold on to the ball; Harriet Jamieson kicking out to secure a win that, with a little more poise and experience in attack, could have been so much more convincing.

Next week is championship quarter finals; at the top of the bill Nataxis HKFC Ice will take on 8th seeded Police Sirens and second seeds Bloomberg HK Scottish Kukri tackle Society General Valley Red Ladies. HKCC Babes face off against Comvita City, in what should prove an exciting contest.

Unfortunately, your correspondent won’t be here to see it, or any future matches, owing to an imminent departure from Hong Kong. As ever with stories about this beautiful city, the tale is one of endless arrivals and departures, of soaring summers and hot-pot winters. The centerpiece of my own version will certainly be the fantastic, utterly brilliant year with HKCC, both on and off the pitch; when the most drunken 7s declaration ever made (why yes, Anna Holmes, maybe I would be interested in playing rugby again) became one of the best decisions I ever made. My thanks to bc magazine for hosting these only-slightly-biased match reports; and most of all to the people who’ve appeared in them. Babes, you’re all awesome – Keep playing ‘til the lights go out. HK….CC!

So, What Happened in Tuen Mun Yesterday?

So, What Happened in Tuen Mun Yesterday?

The whole day can be split into two halves, the protest and the after protest. On top of this, it can also be split into two other parts, what happened and why it happened.

Regarding the actual protest and what happened, it was largely an orderly and peaceful affair meandering through central Tuen Mun to protest at the smugglers domination of the town. What was interesting was that I never heard, saw, or was told about any local residents objecting to the march. From my observations, I would say that the vast majority of the local residents supported the march and welcomed their daily plight being acknowledged by outsiders.

Once the march ended the tone changed. By this point there was at least 500 people packed into the Tuen Mun’s main square and without any kind of leadership the groups began to split into small splinter groups of between 50-100 people. These groups seemed to be led by local residents, who knew where all the main smuggler shops in the area were.

The group I was following arrived at one smuggler shop with about 100 protestors and blocked everyone in. There was chanting and shouting but no violence towards the shop. About ten minutes later the first police arrived. They lined themselves up infront of the shop, despite there being no actual threat of real violence.

After about a ten minute stand-off, the group I was with heard that in another Mall the police had already used pepper spray, so they’d decided to change venues and show support. As the group exited the main Tuen Mun Mall called, Trend Mall, it ran passed a group of about 10 policemen who had been sent as reinforcements. They were left in a quandary as to whether they should follow us, or go to the shop we’d just left.

Here is a critical point that you should understand, the group had arrived at the smuggler shop and completely blocked it, but there was no violence. Yet in a completely different location where the police were they’d already used pepper spray. The video of this is on the web. You can see clearly, the most that happened in that Mall was some shoving and defiant standing of ground. No actual violence against police.

Later, after another twenty or so minutes of standing in the main square, another splinter group broke off and headed back to the shop we had first visited. What was originally a small splinter group quickly formed into the entire protest group going back into Trend Mall. Not knowing the layout of Trend Mall and fearful of being trapped inside, I remained outside for about 15minutes, not realising that Trend mall has dozens of exits. I watched at least 300 protesters enter the Mall

Outside we could hear chanting and jeering coming from upstairs, but nothing that would indicate that there was any serious trouble going on. Suddenly a team of about 8 police officers ran through the main doors heading for the second floor, I immediately followed directly behind them up the two escalators. When this small team of officers reached the top of the second floor they were blocked by crowds. They immediately ploughed into the crowd and all hell broke out.

https://vine.co/v/OUhUmOx1KnW

I was directly behind the police officers so could see everything. I wouldn’t describe it as a fight, as only the police were truly fighting, but the police were totally outnumbered and being met with stiff resistance as the protestors refused to budge. There is no doubt in my mind, had the crowd wanted to attack the policemen like in any other city in the world, these policeman would have had no power to stop it and would have been easily over-powered.

It was altogether a ridiculous move on behalf of the police and shows just how much they abuse the protestors passivity. The scrap lasted a good few minutes and the police were definitely in a tight predicament of their own making. At least one policeman and two protestors were down.

Pepper spray was being sprayed indiscriminately like they were spraying cockroaches. It was a complete mess, the police weren’t protecting anything, they just bowled into the crowd fighting. Interestingly, it is now clear from the videos, that it is exactly the same police team that had used pepper spray in the previous Mall that came barging into the crowds at Trend Mall. So, they had effectively come from that incident bringing the same level of intensity with them.

I want to point out again here, we had been in Trend Mall with a 100 protestors just 45minutes prior and there were no police and no violence. Now the police were here and everything was in meltdown.

Within minutes of the pepper spray being fired another 10 or so policemen came up the escalator and reinforced the small corner they were blocked in. Within another 5minutes of that, the police hoisted their red flag and attacked the crowd again, dragging protestors onto the floor to arrest them.

As I watched the spectacle, it seemed that the wisest thing the police should have done is retreated. The crowd was not unruly, it wasn’t smashing or breaking anything, it was just there. Which confirms a point I’ve already made several times that the police whether by order or just shear stubbornness do not want to give up an inch of territory and will therefore use any amount of violence on the crowds for just being there. For them illegal assembly is Route One to violence now. The violence is not justified because they simply aren’t receiving any violence back.

In these situations, I know the police are scared. I also get that large crowds are intimidating, but as police officers, who are paid well by the tax payer, they need to manage themselves professionally and simply attacking crowds because they are there is just plain stupid and unprofessional.

If it were a gang of triads, they wouldn’t use the same level of violence as they would have a full on fight on their hands. These direct action groups of young people never assault the police and it’s akin to watching a lion take down a farmyard cow and the lion complaining because the cow swung its head too hard while the lion was was using both its teeth and claws to maul. The fights are always one-sided with the crowd only shoving and the police swinging batons at anything that moves.

After a few minutes of scuffles, the situation stabilised somewhat, and I was then singled out by a young policeman who bundled me down the escalator for no other reason than he was pumped up from the fight. After this, a number of lower level skirmishes happened all over Tuen Mun, but not nearly to the same intensity. The main fracas in my opinion was caused by the group of policeman barrelling into a large crowd on Level 10. What did they expect?

So, having established what happened, the main issue is WHY did it happen. Just why were the direct action groups there and why are they willing to be attacked time and time again by an angry and frustrated police force? This I will explain in the next post.

The first photo is the smuggler shop the first time we visited after the police arrived. You can see, it’s calm. It’s not chaotic. Once the police arrive in numbers they start throwing their weight around and this is what causes the conflicts.

Video and photos courtesy of their owners

Women’s Rugby Results – 7 February, 2015

Premiership

SCAA CWB Phoenix v USRC Tigers
@ KGV, Kick-off: 16:30

Valley Black v Gai Wu
@ Happy Valley, Kick-off: 18:00

Kowloon v Taipo Dragons
@ KGV, Kick-off: 18:00

National League 1

HKCC 5-0 Police Sirens
@Aberdeen Sports Ground, Kick-off: 18:00

HKFC Ice 15-0 SCAA CWB Phoenix
@HKFC, Kick-off: 18:00

HK Scottish 36-15 Valley Red XV
@Tai Hang Tung Recreation Ground, Kick-off: 18:00

City Sparkles 13-0 Revolution SRC Ladies
@Shek Kip Mei Sports Ground, Kick-off: 18:00

Police Media Harassment @ Tuen Mun

tuen mun 8 feb 2015

bc’s Richard Scotford was in Tuen Mun covering the anti-smuggler protests as the pepper-spray started flying in the shopping mall when he was verbally harassed and assaulted by a young policeman who tried to shove him down an escalator.

Here’s his initial thoughts on what happened

“I don’t think they knew who I was, here’s what happened. You may have seen some video of the police raising a red flag and going crazy with the pepper spray in a shopping mall. Well in those videos, I am just to the right, out of shot standing at top of the escalator. Clearly I can’t go forward as there is pepper spray going off everywhere. The escalator I’m on has been sealed off at the bottom by police after I came up it. So as the police pushed forward I was left behind the police line.

A young policeman then beelined for me and started to push me down the escalator. I protested and showed my press card but he was shoving me quite hard to go down. When I revealed I was press he then feigned that he didn’t speak English. About 300 people all around lining the shopping centre could see him trying to bundle me down the stairs and began to boo. His senior officer came along and then took over.

This is what you see here now in the still photo. I’m trying to explain to him that I wasn’t even moving, was behind police line and that I was press. He said that I was crossing police cordon, which is a lie, as on the other side of the police line was a battle.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2nPGXBMptA

This is no different to the regular verbal and physical harassment that other members of the press and public have received when standing there peacefully covering the protests or walking around Hong Kong. Why is it that the police now feel the need to antagonistically and confrontationally get right-up in someone’s face and scream at them… If you want someone to move ask them politely. As can be seen in the video Richard is just standing there when the young policemen goes off on him. There’s no one around him, no pushing or shoving, no urgent need for him to move as the position he’s covering the fracas from is not interring with any police action…

Photo and video courtesy of their owners

Made in Hong Kong Music Festival @ The AIA Great European Carnival – 7-8 February, 2015

vs indie music festival

7th February:
Hey Rachel (Acoustic/Pop/SongWriter)
Tonyi Ng (Pop)
Gravity Alterstra (Electronic)
Rain in Time及時雨 (Post-Hardcore)
Shandy Gan 顏培珊(Bossa Nova)

8th February:
ChintungTse 謝芊彤 (Acoustic/Pop/SongWriter)
Sil Hung Mo 小紅帽 (Indie pop)
Jabin Law (Folk/Blues/Alternative/Rock)
大人之音樂 (Brainiac of Electronic & Looping Music Unit)
Tri-deuce (Jazz funk/Acid Jazz/Soul)
Lil’ Ashes小塵埃 (Acoustic)

Made in Hong Kong Music Festival
When: 7-8 February, 2015
Where: The AIA Great European Carnival
How much: $125
More info:

Activists, Smugglers, Triads and Police, what could possibly go wrong?

Activists, Smugglers, Triads and Police, what could possibly go wrong?

Over a month ago I had the good fortune to sit at a table surrounded by some highly motivated, young activists. We discussed many issues concerning protest in Hong Kong and one of the issues they kept coming back to were the operations that were starting up in Sheung Shui to confront the parallel traders, or smugglers. They were very keen to hear my views on it. The fact was that I didn’t really know much about what was going on in Sheung Shui and I answered, to my discredit now, that I thought it was a distraction from the main idea of political reform. I wrongly believed, at the time, that their focus would have been better served in Admiralty or 9wu. My only redemption was that I asked the pointed question;

Do the local people support you in your efforts against the smugglers? Their answer was a categorical, Yes. Then, it can’t be a bad thing, I replied.

A month is a long time in politics and the actions that have since taken place in the districts have shown that the Direct Action Groups that these young, activists belong to are very politically astute. While the more traditional methods of protest have temporarily stalled, they have created an entirely new frontline that is a realistic way to build horizontal support and increase vertical pressure.

This is not big politics, it is raw street politics. The northern towns of The New Territories are awash with smuggler dens that transport everything from baby milk, to iPhones to live lobsters across the border daily. They serve no public function for the local residents The locals aren’t getting rich from this thriving trade. Resentment is at breaking point in these districts. In responding to the alleged attempted fire-attack on one of the smuggler shops the other day, Apple Daily reported that one local said, “He wished they would burn all the shops.”

The Direct Action Groups reasoning is simple and raw, we are local people and we will prove that we can solve local issues.

Taking on the smugglers is not easy political capital. That’s why the government refuses to do it. Too many vested interests. On top of this, these smuggling rings are almost certainly linked in to other forms of organised crime or dark forces across the border. Despite this, at great personal risk to themselves many Direct Action Groups have been conducting anti-smuggler actions week in week out, largely going under the radar of traditional media. They have had great success given that the only resource they really have are their own bodies and time.

The linchpin to the preventing the thriving industry is the MTR. The smugglers are operating on very tight margins so the business model ideally involves carrying as much as possible in trolleys on the MTR. The MTR does have strict regulations on baggage size and weight, which it tries to enforce, but the smugglers overwhelm the staff on duty with both numbers and threats of violence. The MTR staff want the problem solved, The local police want the problem solved and have also assisted in helping the groups make the smugglers queue up to have bags weighed and measured. This has had an effect, but unfortunately the side-effect has been to push the smugglers to other areas and other means of transport, like the buses. The smugglers are a tenacious bunch. The appetite for their products across the border is voracious.

The small gains achieved have definitely endeared the locals with the activists, but the problem is huge and needs to be tackled in every district simultaneously.

This Sunday, Feb 8th the Direct Action Groups will launch their biggest operation yet in a combined action in Tuen Mun. Early reports are that the triads will be waiting to meet them. As a little side reference, during the skirmishes at the Mongkok Occupy, it was widely reported that the so-called triads who joined forces with the Blue Ribbons were not local but from Tuen Mun. Things could certainly get heated. The bravery of these Direct Action Groups is mind boggling. I will go to this operation, but I have no qualms in saying, I’m scared.

Sunday will be interesting, especially as there is one other principle actor that I haven’t really mentioned much yet, the police. Firstly, let’s get this clear, I’m not anti-police, but I’m certainly vehemently against bad-policing. If the police want me to stop writing about them then police fairly. It’s simple. It’s not rocket science!

If you’ve seen any of the post-Occupy police videos you will notice that there’s a key theme running through all of them; Law and Order. Any policeman interfacing with the public or media now needs to make sure we all know that this is the central business the police are in, keeping law and order.

Given this, this Sunday’s operation will be a huge test for the police, which has been specifically created by the Direct Action Groups. Everyone will be watching to see if the police can put their personal political prejudices to one side for the sake of law and order: Triad gangs, smugglers, civic groups all in the mix together. How are the police going to catorgorize the threats to law and order?

Batons out and pepper spray are standard procedure these days when facing off large groups of civic groups. Last Sunday’s Tai Po operation showed that the police feel it is operationally expedient to just pat away Blue Ribbons acting violently, yet engage in baton charges or resort to dangerous choke holds on Yellows until they faint. The police may understand this in their heads, but the general public does not. We look at that video of the policeman dragging the boy out by his neck, and think what is the rationale for this level of violence? What did that person do to receive such thuggery from the police? This is the bad policing that more and more people are growing to deplore.

The issue is easily fixed. The solution is not silencing the persistent criticism that arises on social media. The solution lies in fair and equal policing: something the police have lost sight of under the direction of Andy Tsang. Instead, the police are operationally biased from the moment they leave their briefing rooms and step foot on the street. Civic groups engaging in illegal assembly is now the most pressing threat the police perceive and they want to use force to address it. Hoisting banners informing people that they ‘may’ be in an illegal gathering and ‘may’ be subject to violence may make sense in Andy Tsang’s world of CCP cronies, but for people who still have their moral compasses in tact the police’s Route One to violence method is abhorrent and inhumane. Let’s not forget here, no one has been convicted of illegal assembly yet. No one has even been charged officially with illegal assembly yet. So why do the police think they are justified in beating people on suspicion of illegal assembly?

The HKPF is going to have to be a lot smarter and sharper this weekend if it’s going to avoid another free fall in its approval rating. Excuses that, it’s not us it’s them, are wearing very thin now from a force that is paid well to be professional and impartial. If people are gathering illegally, arrest them, charge them and send them to court, don’t beat them, that just makes you look like thugs and black hearts.

To conclude, The Direct the Action Groups are smart. They have created this explosive cocktail for a reason. Only vested interest groups feel threatened by it.

The smugglers are breaking laws and regulations day in, day out unchecked. This operation will highlight the detrimental effects it has on Hong Kong society.

On top of this, the police will be forced to demonstrate their commitment to law and order above their open political biases and personal vendettas.

We have all experienced that many police officers have more in common with rowdy Blue Ribbons and aggressive triads than they have with ‘snot-nosed students’ demanding democracy, but they need to rise above this and concentrate on their jobs, which they keep reminding us is law and order.

Law and order in New Territories’ towns is breaking down because they’re over run with smugglers, not because kids are gathering illegally to complain about them.